DroopyBassets75 claimed: Many thanks with the strategies on People bullets. The only real motive why I am using these is usually that I now experienced them loaded up for an AR and also a Mini-14 and however Have got a thousand or so free fifty five grain Hornady FMJ bullets to implement.
My buddy (Dave in Idaho) wishes me to shoot match quality ammo so terrible that he went out and acquired me a box of 168 gr hornady HPBT moly coated match bullets. (BTW many thanks yet again dave.)
Thanks Pete, you are able to be in my Army any working day! I selected to disregard the minor slam, it Will not signify nothin'! I did not know that everyone had to be equivalent and talk in the exact same terms. The expression arises from the outdated expressing "the pill that kills".
Posted: five/3/2016 7:47:forty eight AM EDT [#9] I've been trying CFE223 with a few 55 grain bullets. Even now dealing with it. I can say that It appears to "feed" pretty well. I've been working with my Hornady Digital powder evaluate/scale even though Doing the job up my loads. The CFE223 feeds so rapid the powder measure are unable to properly meter it (the Digital one particular). It gives me consistent around alarms. Even utilizing the method button to slow down the metering a lot more than placing it in "gradual" isn't going to do the job. I have not tried it inside the common powder evaluate yet but count on It could be pretty dependable. I did, sort of lucky seriously, operate throughout a really precise BLC2 load a few vary outings back.
To point out viewers the best way to triumph at very long variety, J. Guthrie gears up for any demanding shot when chasing Colorado pronghorn at lengthy array with DPMS' Panther 6.5 Creedmoor.
However the downsides have all been stated higher than: really temperature sensitive, particularly in warmth, and very filthy burning. It might carbon up a .223 bore so promptly that immediately after 50 rounds you would have the perception from investigating the muzzle the bore wasn't copper fouling.
This can be an more mature thread, you may not get a response, and will be reviving an old thread. Please think about developing a new thread.
You'll get an electronic mail every Friday morning featuring the latest chatter from the most well liked subject areas, breaking news bordering legislation, and special promotions only available to ARFCOM e-mail subscribers.
Besides Benchmark, you can find a bunch of powders around now with identical burn charges, that do not have the downsides of H335.
I browse it someplace on that site with regards to the TTSX and XTB. I have not found any CFE-223 data any place else. I is going to be happy if the data makes it towards the paper manuals!
I've a hermaphrodite cross known as the 6mm Cheapshot. It's the .223 situation necked up but then the shoulder pushed back And so the cartridge has the 6x47 extended neck.
I reload over a progressive Dillon RL550B whose automated powder evaluate is renown for not liking adhere powders. Several a long time in the past I switched to mostly ball or shorter cut powders and H335 can be a mainstay powder for loads from 223 to forty five-70. And that's why the aside is very important to me.
1gr off, I'm not about to sweat it on a bulk load. Specifically for ball powder. Could possibly verify the very first three after staying satisfied with where 10 toss. Then do some randoms to make certain it hasn't walked. Ordinarily stroll from the charge approximately with my h335 powder load data lower-close Escale, then validate employing a beam kind for pace.
Then equally of them tried a lot of the plastic recommendations, and adjusted their minds. The moment I tried Benchmark and Ramshot TAC during the .223 my remaining H335 went unused. And currently there are much more clean-burning ideal powders.